Witch Hunt 2.0

Maggie Wall's Grave

Click to read the story behind the photo.

When something bad happens, it seems to be human nature to find something –or someone– to blame it on. A few-hundred years ago, it was easy to find a scapegoat for a bad harvest, mental illness of a loved-one, the sudden death of your goat, a boil on your butt, or a hangnail. This scapegoat was called a witch.

It must have been pretty easy to find someone in any 17th century town that could be easily labelled a witch. It could be someone that didn’t follow societal norms, had mental illness, had a preponderance of warts, or had the dreaded third nipple (these were sometimes called the ‘witches mark‘ as the nipple was supposed to be used by demons to feed).

Today we are so much more knowledgeable about the world. When we have a bad harvest, we generally recognize that weather patterns have a random element. Mental illness is generally considered to be something hereditary, or environmental, and not the result of being cursed. We seek rational and scientific explanations when things go wrong, right?

Not so in politics and business. It’s the Witch Hunt 2.o.

Now, instead of comparing the weight of the accused to a duck, the yard stick of choice is an auditor.

We like to think that auditors are unbiased, truth-seeking individuals right? Well, if your competence is estimated by your ability to find fault in something, I think you are likely to find fault in anything. For comparison, think of a crown prosecutor or district attorney: are they lauded by the number of cases they won, or with the number of cases where justice was done? Yah, when an auditor is asked to find fault, they go for the win too.

A case in point: Toronto Mayor Rob Ford goes after the Toronto Housing Board (TCHC).

Mr. Ford has asked for the resignation of the volunteer TCHC board members citing the auditor’s findings that revealed: “between $4 million and $10 million was wasted on sole-sourced contracts. The report also revealed issues with record-keeping at the agency and found that $200,000 was misspent on luxury chocolates, spa trips and a Christmas party.”

Wow, doesn’t that piss you off? A government agency wasting $10M and spending $200K on chocolate. The nerve! Fire all those evil volunteer board… WITCHES!

But lets scratch the surface by actually reading some of this auditors report:

Significant cost savings are likely possible if the recommendations contained in this report as well as the City Auditor General’s previously issued audit reports are implemented. Procurement at the TCHC is in the range of $200 million. Savings as a result of increased competition could in our view be anywhere from two to five per cent of this amount. Conservatively, cost savings of approximately $4 million to $10 million may be possible. In addition, significant savings are possible as a result of increased coordination of operations between the TCHC and the City.

Wait, 2 to 5%? I’d be willing to bet that any armchair quarterback could look at any organization’s books and find 2-5% that could have been saved. Would you call for the leadership’s resignation? If they took such liberties with $4-10M headline, I am starting to wonder how much was spent on chocolate…

What happened next? The volunteer, unpaid, counsellors were dismissed and replaced by a close friend of Rob Ford (he lead his transition team) who is going to receive an undisclosed paycheck! Wha?

The point of this post is not to show that Rob Ford is reading from a well-worn copy of ‘Dictatorship for Dummies!’, but how we as citizens and employees so often get duped by the same refrain: “The system is broken because of evil corrupt people that go to work every day trying to screw us!” Nobody seems willing to look at all the people they know, and at themselves, and realize that the vast majority of people don’t think this way (Rob Ford could perhaps be an exception here).

Lets look at some of the drawbacks of using the Witch Hunt 2.0 mentality when trying to improve organizational performance:

  • Successful organizations are based on trust, you start with a serious trust deficit if you treat the organization as they enemy
  • Fear is a poor motivator, when was the last time you heard of a team winning a championship because of fear?
  • One of your first moves is usually to oust a bunch of people who have organizational knowledge of the very problems you are trying to fix
  • A focus on bad people ignores a much more prevalent problem: bad systems

So what can we do about the Witch Hunt 2.0? Stop supporting (or electing, or appointing) people who spend most of their time pointing fingers.

Quiz: Can You Recognize Good Performance?

[Skip to the bottom for the poll.]

It seems that the world loves certification. If the competence of a supplier can’t be determined, or testimonials aren’t available, a piece of paper with a seal and signature will often do just fine. If you can build a business around providing this certification, all the better…

Introducing the ‘Positive Recognition Accreditation Test’.

Follow these steps:

  1. Print this questionnaire.
  2. Choose the best answer for each question using an HB pencil, making sure to completely circle your answer.
  3. Attach a recent picture of yourself, and two proofs of purchase.
  4. Wad up the papers and throw them out the nearest window.
  5. Stop worrying, our process is really advanced, we will get your submission.
  6. Please allow 36-48 weeks for delivery of your certification.
  7. Once confirmed, please be sure to use ‘PRAT’ after your name, and wear your new found accreditation proudly.

The Questionnaire:

When should these meetings occur?

  1. Do them along with the corporate performance review cycle; once a year should do it.
  2. As a rule, every time you present your employee’s work as your own, you should take the time to provide them positive feedback.
  3. As close as possible to when the positive behaviour or outcomes were observed, in order to have the greatest positive benefit.

What is the best way to set up a recognition session with an employee?

  1. Inform the employee that you need to talk to them about ‘an HR issue’.
  2. “You, in my office, now!”
  3. Set up a short meeting with the employee regarding ‘positive feedback’ at a time where you can give them your undivided attention.

What is the appropriate agenda for the meeting?

  1. Set aside time to get to know each other, as this is the first time you realized that this person even reports to you.
  2. Time is money, make sure to ask the employee for other things you need to get done while they are basking in your adulation.
  3. Stick to providing the positive feedback, otherwise the session won’t really be a reward.

What is the best way to provide the feedback?

  1. Buzzwords, lots of buzzwords. e.g. “That was some real client-oriented  best-in-class hyper-collaboration in execution our game plan! You’re really taking it to the next level!”
  2. High-five, low-five, round the back, over the top handshake.
  3. Use precise, descriptive terms that indicate observed behaviours and how they related to positive outcomes.

How do you close the meeting?

  1. Say “Now go get ‘em champ!” as you smack their butt on the way out the door.
  2. Hug it out.
  3. Ask the employee to think on how to continue to build on this success, and to bring this up at the next performance & goal-setting review.